| The Fisheries Agency
of Japan is going to add Pacific white-sided dolphins
to the catch quota of the drive fishery from the
hunting season in 2007. Elsa Nature Conservancy
strongly objects to this and sent the following
comments to the Fishery Agency. |
|
Elsa Nature Conservancy
November 27, 2006
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
Fisheries Agency, Resources Management Department, Far Seas
Fisheries Division
Kasumigaseki 1-2-1, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8950
Fax: 03-3591-5824
Gentlepersons,
I hereby submit an opinion and
information regarding “Draft
for Partial Amendment to Separate Specification and Notification
by the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries on
Toothed Whales (Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
Notification No. 564 of 2001) in Accordance with the Provisions
of the Proviso in Article 82.1 of the Ministerial Order on
Permission for and Control of Designated Fisheries.”
Elsa Nature Conservancy (ENC) strongly objects to permitting
the capture of Pacific white-sided dolphins, and hereby voices
its opposition.
Reasons:
1. As a reason for adding the Pacific white-sided dolphin,
the notification cites “a strong request from fishers
in recent years to allow their capture.”
This alone appears to mean that fishers in general want
to take Pacific white-sided dolphins as part of their work
as fishers. But in fact the request for capturing
Pacific white-sided dolphins comes from the Japan Cetacean Conference on
Zoological Gardens and Aquariums, and the fishers are not
fishers in general but a very
small number of fishers who belong to the Isana Union in Taiji Town.
2. An internal communication sent by the Japan Cetacean
Conference on Zoological Gardens and Aquariums (Senzo Uchida,
Executive Secretary) on August 16, 2006 to the directors
of zoos and aquariums which are members of the Cetacean Conference
(see attachment) noted that Pacific white-sided dolphins
are hard to obtain, and that not all aquarium directors who
desire to obtain them have done so. The letter states, “Permission
has not been granted to take Pacific white-sided dolphins
at Taiji, and therefore drive fisheries for them are not
allowed. But if the capture of Pacific white-sided dolphins
becomes possible at Taiji, it will benefit aquariums with
cetaceans, and fishers.” Attached to this was a questionnaire
asking about the desire to obtain small cetaceans and titled
Application for the Eighth Meeting of the Japan Cetacean
Conference on Zoological Gardens and Aquariums (see attachment).
This is an attempt by aquariums
that want Pacific white-sided dolphins to influence Taiji
Town to capture this species
in hunts (because cetaceans are air-breathing
mammals, ENC refers to attempts to capture them as “hunts,” not
as “fishing”), then share the profits with Taiji Town fishers,
but such commercial trading in wild animals involves many problems.
The main
problems are detailed below.
First, dolphins captured live for aquariums fetch far higher
prices than do dolphins processed for meat, and dolphins
thus purchased by aquariums are sold to China and other countries
for prices about seven times the initial purchase price under
the pretext of “scientific purposes.” This is
none other than “dolphin flipping,” in which
an educational facility (specifically, the Taiji Whale Museum),
defined as an institution for social education by the Social
Education Law Article 9 and the Museums Act Article 2, sacrifices
wild animals in an attempt to make money in this way and
thereby solve its financial problems. This is unacceptable,
and there is even strong opposition to it from among local
citizens and town council members. It is anticipated that
if the capture of Pacific white-sided dolphins is permitted,
it will further increase this “dolphin flipping” under
the pretext of “scientific exchanges.”
Second, as seen from the aforesaid internal communication
of the Japan Cetacean Conference on Zoological Gardens and
Aquariums, the Pacific white-sided dolphins
would be captured in hunts. But these dolphin drives involve many problems
(see the enclosed leaflet: “Problems with Dolphin Drive Hunts as Seen
by the Elsa Nature Conservancy”).
Third, as you are well aware, severe criticism is being
leveled at dolphin drive hunts by nature, animal, and environmental
protection organizations
around the world, but in addition to that, the World Association of Zoos
and Aquariums
(WAZA) seeks the discontinuance of these hunts as they violate its code
of ethics, and it has warned WAZA member aquariums throughout
the world not
to purchase dolphins which have been captured in drive hunts (see enclosed
copy
of letter sent by WAZA president to member organizations). This means that
criticism of dolphin hunts is increasing even from among aquariums which
have dolphins.
Fourth, currently over 200 marine mammal experts and other
specialists worldwide are voicing their objections to dolphin
hunts from a scientific standpoint,
and are collecting signatures to demand their discontinuance by issuing
scientific statements (see enclosed copies of some of these
documents obtained by ENC).
Fifth, the internal communication sent by the Japan Cetacean
Conference on Zoological Gardens and Aquariums says, “There is no hope of a larger
quota for bottlenose dolphins, which necessitates management of stocks,” and
says it is necessary to develop “measures which enable a sustainable
dolphin supply.” This means that the capture of bottlenose dolphins needs
to be restrained in order to ensure a stable future supply. Although the notification
states that Pacific white-sided dolphin “stocks are sufficient for sustainable
use,” if the government allows the capture of Pacific white-sided
dolphins, which are in high demand by aquariums, one can easily anticipate
that the fate
of bottlenose dolphins awaits Pacific white-sided dolphins as well.
Sixth is the current situation in Taiji Town, which wants
to capture Pacific white-sided dolphins. As you are well
aware, this year the hunting
season
was moved ahead one month, and dolphin hunting began in September.
It is said this
is becausee the Taiji Whale Museum
wants to obtain dolphins before other aquarium facilities do.
Brushing aside opposition from Taiji Town citizens and
environmental and animal protection organizations, in 2005
the Taiji Whale Museum
sold eight
bottlenose
dolphins to a Chinese aquarium for seven times the purchase price:
each dolphin was about 5.2 million yen, for a total of US$400,000,
or about
41,600,000
yen. This transaction had little to do with “international scientific exchange.” Further,
in May 2006 the Taiji Whale Museum sold dolphins to China for US$375,000
(about 43 million yen), which was about seven times the 6.4 million
yen it had paid
to the Taiji Fishing Cooperative for them. It is believed that the
primary purpose of these sales is to stave off a financial crisis
for the Taiji Whale
Museum. Because one dolphin died before shipping, the actual number
of dolphins sold this year was seven.
With plans for more reselling to aquariums, the Taiji Whale
Museum has purchased a considerable number of dolphins from
the Taiji Fishing
Cooperative,
which
started its hunts a month early this season. Information obtained
by ENC indicates that species and quantities are: four short-finned
pilot
whales,
10 false killer
whales, 22 bottlenose dolphins (two of them juveniles), and three
pantropical spotted dolphins. However, of these already one short-finned
pilot
whale, one false-killer whale, and two pantropical spotted dolphins
have died
while in
possession of the Whale Museum, and the remaining three short-finned
pilot whales in the pen have developed spinal disorders.
An examination of the site revealed that the purchased
animals are kept in pens fenced into small sections or in
small rusted
tanks.
The two
bottlenose dolphin juveniles purchased by the museum are being
force-fed in a small,
simple pool set up behind the building, where visitors will not
see it. In
our judgment,
this is certainly not what could be called “wild animal protection” or “scientific
exchange,” and it should not be done by a facility that
bills itself as an educational facility. This obsession with
quick profits is not only uneducational,
but also clear abuse of animals.
As one can see from the internal communication sent by
the Japan Cetacean Conference on Zoological Gardens and Aquariums,
the
capture and use
of Pacific white-sided
dolphins is done primarily by Taiji Town, i.e., the Taiji Whale
Museum, through the Taiji Fishing Cooperative. Under these
circumstances, permitting the
capture of Pacific white-sided dolphins in drive hunts would
abet this shameful conduct,
and promote the exploitation and abuse of wild animals.
For these reasons we oppose permitting the capture of Pacific
striped dolphins, and request that you reconsider this matter.
Sincerely,
Eiji Fujiwara, President
cc: Media
Enclosures:
1) Copy of the internal communication sent by the Japan Cetacean
Conference on Zoological Gardens and Aquariums on August
16, 2006 to the directors of zoos and aquariums which are
members of the Cetacean Conference, and a copy of the questionnaire
asking about the desire to obtain small cetaceans and titled
Application for the Eighth Meeting of the Japan Cetacean
Conference on Zoological Gardens and Aquariums
2) Copy of letter sent by WAZA president to member organizations
3) Copies of opinion statements on dolphin drive hunts from
a scientific standpoint by marine mammal experts and others
4) Copy of ENC leaflet, “Problems with Dolphin Drive
Hunts as Seen by the Elsa Nature Conservancy”
|